The release of the figures
on young people's treatment for 2012-13 by Public Health England would seem
to show a continuing decline in demand and further improvements in performance.
The numbers of young people under 18 accessing treatment fell from a peak of
24,053 in 2008-09 to 20,032 in 2012-13, with Public Health England observing
that “this reflects the overall decline in alcohol and drug use by young people
over recent years”. That said, it is stressed that alcohol and cannabis
continue to cause problems for some young people, while new problems are being
created by club drugs and new psychoactive substances. The numbers of young
people receiving help with club drugs rose from 2,007 in 2011-12 to 2,834 in
2012-13. Problems with heroin continue to affect only a very small minority:
175 in 2012-13.
The performance of the system is also encouraging. The
statistics record an improvement in waiting times, with 99 per cent of young
people waiting fewer than three weeks for treatment and an average wait of two
days. Around four fifths of young people coming into specialist treatment services
left having 'successfully completed' in 2012-13.
The figures are particularly striking in a period when
local authorities have been managing cuts to their budgets. Young people's
services have historically been more dependent on local funding sources than
adult treatment and therefore should be more vulnerable to cuts when local
budgets are squeezed.
In addition, there has been less drive and leadership
from national government on young people's drug and alcohol services, compared
to the strong interest at senior ministerial level in adult treatment and the
challenge of 'building recovery in communities'. Indeed there is a general
feeling that the Department for Education - in contrast to the former
Department for Children, Schools and Families - has stepped back from drug
policy. That service provision appears to be holding up in such circumstances is
encouraging.
It does, however, raise the question of whether these
statistics tell the whole story. When I was at Nacro, the crime reduction
charity, we were constantly warning journalists and others of the perils of
using statistics on offences recorded by the police as a guide to crime rates
(incidentally, police figures are still being used for local crime mapping).
For example, when the police improved procedures for reporting and recording
racist crime following the Macpherson Report on the murder of Stephen Lawrence,
this resulted in an increase in recorded racist crime. This was a good thing, reflecting a greater
willingness to report, record and follow up on these offences.
Somewhat similarly, the numbers of young people accessing
and being referred to treatment and the availability of treatment are not
wholly independent variables - put crudely, you can only refer someone into a
treatment service if there is one to refer them to.
Nor is there a direct and unmediated relationship between
the overall numbers of young people using drugs and alcohol and the need for
specialist treatment, so that a fall in one will necessarily explain a fall in
the other.
Only a tiny proportion of under-18s using substances will
ever require specialist support and a whole range of other factors tend to come
into play where they do - such as experience of trauma and abuse, problems in
education, offending, mental health and social exclusion. I'd treat the claim
that a fall in the numbers accessing treatment is necessarily explained by
overall decline in the much larger numbers who are using drugs and/or alcohol
with some caution - which is not, of course, to deny that the decline is
relevant and may well be significant too.
Nor, of course, and as Public Health England recognise, do figures on the availability of specialist drug and alcohol services for young people tell the full story about the need for and availability of interventions. Most young people experiencing problems where substance misuse is a factor are unlikely to ever come into contact with specialist services, but may seek support (or fail to do so) from GPs and other primary care services, mental health services, mainstream children and young people’s service and through other routes. Less is known about the quality and availability of this support.
Nor, of course, and as Public Health England recognise, do figures on the availability of specialist drug and alcohol services for young people tell the full story about the need for and availability of interventions. Most young people experiencing problems where substance misuse is a factor are unlikely to ever come into contact with specialist services, but may seek support (or fail to do so) from GPs and other primary care services, mental health services, mainstream children and young people’s service and through other routes. Less is known about the quality and availability of this support.
I’ve just attended the launch of the Young Mind’s report Same
old, about young offenders and mental health, and the problems in
accessing services – so it’s also relevant to note that the PHE figures exclude
the young people’s secure estate.
All in all, the figures provide grounds for cautious
optimism, but it will be important to keep a close eye on interventions for
young people during a period of change and transition for local authorities,
and with new drug trends too.
The
PHE report Substance
misuse among young people in England 2012-13
is at http://www.nta.nhs.uk/uploads/ypstats2012-13commentary[0].pdf
The
Young Minds report Same
old – the experiences of young offenders with mental health needs is at http://www.youngminds.org.uk/assets/0000/9472/Barrow_Cadbury_Report.pdf
DrugScope’s
website for 11-14 year olds – D
world - is at http://www.drugscope-dworld.org.uk/
December’s
policy blog was written by DrugScope’s Director of Policy and Membership,
Marcus Roberts.
No comments:
Post a Comment